Friday, March 19, 2010

Obama Snubs Allies to Press a Bill Americans Don't want

Now for the Slaughter by Peggy Noonan, WSJ

"Excuse me, but it is embarrassing—really, embarrassing to our country—that the president of the United States has again put off a state visit to Australia and Indonesia because he's having trouble passing a piece of domestic legislation he's been promising for a year will be passed next week. What an air of chaos this signals to the world. And to do this to Australia of all countries, a nation that has always had America's back and been America's friend...."

 "...Thursday's decision followed the most revealing and important broadcast interview (on FOX with Bret Baier) of Barack Obama ever. It revealed his primary weakness in speaking of health care, which is a tendency to dodge, obfuscate and mislead. He grows testy when challenged. It revealed what the president doesn't want revealed, which is that he doesn't want to reveal much about his plan..." 

Why is that? Seems Obama doesn't know what is in the bill! Noonan goes on to say:

"Mr. Obama's response: "By the time the vote has taken place, not only will I know what's in it, you'll know what's in it, because it's going to be posted and everybody's going to be able to evaluate it on the merits."

"...That's news in two ways. That it will be posted—one assumes the president means on the Internet and not nailed to a telephone pole—should suggest it will be posted for a while, more than a few hours or days. So American will finally get a look at it.

And the president was conceding that no, he doesn't know what's in the bill right now. It is still amazing that one year into the debate this could be true.

Mr. Baier pressed on the public's right to know what is in the bill. We have been debating the bill for a year, the president responded: "The notion that this has been not transparent, that people don't know what's in the bill, everybody knows what's in the bill. I sat for seven hours with—."

Mr. Baier interrupts: "Mr. President, you couldn't tell me what the special deals are that are in or not today."

Mr. Obama: "I just told you what was in and what was not in."

Mr. Baier: "Is Connecticut in?" He was referring to the blandishments—polite word—meant to buy the votes of particular senators.

Mr. Obama: "Connecticut—what are you specifically referring to?"

Mr. Baier: "The $100 million for the hospital? Is Montana in for the asbestos program? Is—you know, listen, there are people—this is real money, people are worried about this stuff."

Mr. Obama: "And as I said before, this—the final provisions are going to be posted for many days before this thing passes."

I am not surprised that, without a teleprompter, he can't articulate his case for this massive pork fest that will raise taxes and further weaken our economy and our future. This is the Obama I saw on the campaign trail, the one Hillary wiped the floor with in debates.

I encourage you to read all of Noonan's article. It is an eye-opener for someone of repute to point out that it took FOX news to make obvious to everyone that this "bill" is a mish-mash of payoffs, trade-offs, blatant vote-buying, and total disregard of the fact that the majority of Americans DO NOT WANT IT. And that the president pushing this mess upon us has no idea what is in it, which leads us to conclude he also has no idea what effect this will have on our future!

Anyone who is not alarmed about this is either still in a kool-aid stupor and not paying attention. 

Noonan concludes:

"And so it ends, with a health-care vote expected this weekend. I wonder at what point the administration will realize it wasn't worth it—worth the discord, worth the diminution in popularity and prestige, worth the deepening of the great divide. What has been lost is so vivid, what has been gained so amorphous, blurry and likely illusory. Memo to future presidents: Never stake your entire survival on the painful passing of a bad bill..."

 If you don't know why she uses the term "slaughter", you'll find out in this insightful piece. 

No comments: